<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>sjh - mountain biking running linux vegan geek spice   </title>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary</link>
    <description>mtb / vegan / running / linux / canberra / cycling / etc</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] Being sensible in public to avoid Doocing</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 15:36:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2006/05/25#2006-05-25_01</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2006-05-25 15:36:41 --&gt;

I am probably just writing this to push 
&lt;a href=&quot;https://svana.org/sjh/diary/2006/05/24#2006-05-24_01&quot;&gt;Michael, Michael
and Stewart's&lt;/a&gt; heads further down the page so I will not see them every
time I view this site in my browser. Anyway looking back to February last
year, there was a fair bit of stuff on the bloggynet at the time about people
being 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dooced&amp;r=f&quot;&gt;Dooced&lt;/a&gt;.
Anil Dash posited his theory that 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/01/20/a_theory&quot;&gt;no one has ever been
fired for blogging&lt;/a&gt; (with some good comments) and he 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/02/14/nonblogger_fir&quot;&gt;further
commented&lt;/a&gt; on this theory (more in depth) later.

&lt;p&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2005/02/15/nobodys_ever_been_fired_for_blogging.html&quot;&gt;Danah
Boyd further fleshed out the idea&lt;/a&gt; pointing out that people need to pay
attention to how much they are in the public sphere when blogging. Unless you
have one of those closed off, friends only sort of blogs (such as can be
common on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/&quot;&gt;Live Journal&lt;/a&gt; and assuming
you have a reader ship of unknown size (due to google and other search engines
this can almost be guaranteed) you have to be careful how you present yourself,
and remember the context in which you are writing.

&lt;p&gt;

I recall Alli was a little put out with being linked onto 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://planet.linux.org.au/&quot;&gt;Planet Linux Australia&lt;/a&gt; early last
year as she thought she had to be more careful than previously about what she
wrote in her diary. I did not see a problem as Alli is smart and aware of how
the the Internet and search engines and such function to the extent that she
did not write stuff for public consumption that could be too negatively
interpreted.

&lt;p&gt;

On the whole I think anyone who realises what they say either in email to
mailing lists or on their blogs is fodder for search engines and for anyone to
read at some point can be smart enough to keep that context in their
writing. Of course with some of the blogs being so pleased at various people
seemingly being fired for blogging around February last year 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fafblog.blogspot.com/2005/02/blogs-this-weeks-get-list-past-week-or.html&quot;&gt;Giblets
at Fafblog has good insight on the issue&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] Some of the better batgirls</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:05:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2006/01/16#2006-01-16_01</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2006-01-16 18:05:16 --&gt;

Although I have yet to foist my artistic ineptitude on everyone and
participate in the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/himynameisjamie/345568.html&quot;&gt;draw
batgirl meme&lt;/a&gt; I 
&lt;a href=&quot;https://svana.org/sjh/diary/2006/01/14#2006-01-14_02&quot;&gt;mentioned on
Saturday&lt;/a&gt;, in order to find the pictures I like again I may as well link to
some of the pictures I liked the most.

&lt;p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/azn_incognito/158054.html&quot;&gt;Gorgeous 
       headshot&lt;/a&gt;, Babs, this is my favourite I have seen yet. Probably painted,
       but brilliant none the less&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/uminthecoil/233264.html&quot;&gt;Different,
       Ra's sort of style&lt;/a&gt;, Babs (maybe), There is nothing in this drawing
       that obviously says i is batgirl, however it does look like Babs could
       in a Ra's Al Ghul centric elseworlds&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/willworks/19573.html&quot;&gt;Shiny&lt;/a&gt;, 
       Babs, I like the simplicity and the shinyness of this&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&quot;&gt;Sad Cass&lt;/a&gt;,
       Cass, In reality it looks as she appears in the comic anyway, a good
       shot though&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/staedtler/217454.html&quot;&gt;Snowing
       elseworlds&lt;/a&gt;, Elseworlds, A mangaish looking batgirl in snow, very
       effective image&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/lelenia/14558.html&quot;&gt;Green 
       elseworlds&lt;/a&gt;, Elseworlds, smooth lines and an interesting
       interpretation, a bit shiny&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/envertigo/2283.html&quot;&gt;Grey
       uniform striking head&lt;/a&gt;, Babs (maybe), Interesting uniform, with all
       the grey the head comes out really bright. &lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/chrispiers/189429.html&quot;&gt;Babs
       day off&lt;/a&gt;, Babs, Drawings like this make me wish I could draw, great
       perspective.&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/uminomamori/217446.html&quot;&gt;Black 
       and White inspiring&lt;/a&gt;, Elseworlds, I love the first of these images,
       this is an inspiring interpretation of Batgirl I think, this is the
       sort of picture that makes me wish they could get the artist to do an
       elseworlds entire book in black and white with someone like Neil Gaiman
       as the author.&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/jackieocean/179449.html&quot;&gt;Simple,
       Cute Babs&lt;/a&gt;, Babs, Simple lines and colours, a painted look, damn
       Babs looks good in this one, the artist did another one claiming they
       did not like this attempt, I disagree completely and do not like their
       second picture&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/spacecaptsteve/197967.html&quot;&gt;Good,
       slightly futuristic manga style&lt;/a&gt;, Babs, more clean lines, good
       interpretation of the costume &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;

There are a heap more, those are just the images I liked in the first 200 or
so when I looked on Saturday afternoon.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] Must draw Batgirl meme</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:27:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2006/01/14#2006-01-14_02</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2006-01-14 23:27:27 --&gt;

I saw a link to this 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/himynameisjamie/345568.html&quot;&gt;Batgirl
Drawing meme&lt;/a&gt; on 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/13/hundreds_of_fanart_v.html&quot;&gt;BoingBoing&lt;/a&gt;
today. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/&quot;&gt;Livejournal&lt;/a&gt; has been accruing
hundreds of hand drawn variations of Batgirl. Damn I love the Internet, this
almost makes me want to attempt to join in a meme I would be pretty hopeless
at (I am a fairly hopeless artist). I guess part of the appeal to me is, being
such a comics geek, it is cool to see something like this become so popular so
fast, there are around 400 drawings linked from there already, with more
appearing regularly. Sure I am a huge fan of babs, however the few Cassandra
pictures people have done seem to be some of the best. Of course the elseworlds
style pictures are often pretty good too.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] Ooohh look a coincidence, maybe</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 00:00:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2005/11/01#2005-11-01_02</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2005-11-01 00:00:02 --&gt;

I just happened to glance at my posts per month thing in the left hand column
here and look at what I saw. September 2004, 27 posts. September 2005, 27
posts. October 2004, 15 Posts. October 2005, 15 posts. Almost kinda spooky
maybe sorta.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] They noticed we went quiet.</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:53:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2005/10/20#2005-10-20_01</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2005-10-20 10:53:58 --&gt;

Mikal just added to the blog entropy with his post about a 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stillhq.com/diary/001006.html&quot;&gt;work mate noticing how
quiet some of us have been&lt;/a&gt;. I have to admit I was a little surprised when
I saw there was only one post over night on 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://planet.linux.org.au/&quot;&gt;ploa&lt;/a&gt;, I suppose this is, in part due
to the fact Mikal has not been posting anywhere between 100 and 2^32 posts a
day as he tends to when he is no sick and resigned and moving overseas and all
that. I guess I have been a little busy this month also and have not really
been making many posts.

&lt;p&gt;

I was however reading a rather interesting book last night that could be the
source of many posts, however the book is at home so it will not be the source
of posts until at least tonight.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>[comp/blogging] Anonymous blogging</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:39:00 </pubDate>
    <link>https://www.svana.org/sjh/diary/2005/08/31#2005-08-31_01</link>
    <description>&lt;!-- 2005-08-31 22:39:27 --&gt;

I do not really need to point out that this is not an anonymous diary, heck
even without reading the &lt;a href=&quot;https://svana.org/sjh/about_diary.html&quot;&gt;about
page&lt;/a&gt; it is fairly easy to work out who I am.

&lt;p&gt;

At the recent &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogher.org/&quot;&gt;blogher conference&lt;/a&gt; (women
in blogging conference) one of the sessions was titled 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogher.org/2005/08/blogher_audioca_1.html&quot;&gt;How To Get
Naked&lt;/a&gt; (There is Audio available of that session now, the panel consisted of
Heather (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dooce.com/&quot;&gt;dooce&lt;/a&gt;) Armstrong and a few other
well known public bloggers). The session topic was that of blogging where
everyone knows your real identity. This of course brings into focus the other
way to blog, doing so anonymously.

&lt;p&gt;

One rather brilliant (in my opinion) example of a good anonymous blog is 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fafblog.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Fafblog&lt;/a&gt;, I have no idea who these
people are, but damn are they funny, insightful, clever, biting, esoteric,
etc. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/&quot;&gt;EFF&lt;/a&gt; recently released a guide on 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Anonymity/blog-anonymously.php&quot;&gt;How to
Blog Safely&lt;/a&gt;, or anonymous blogging.

&lt;p&gt;

If one were to start an anonymous blog, they would avoid linking to it
elsewhere, would avoid telling people they know or who read anything they
write elsewhere about it as them linking to it or telling others about it
could also be suspicious. Should one just go about writing what they hope is
good content and blog like no one's watching? (because lets face it, it is
pretty much a sure bet that no one is) Consider the recent statistics from
technorati in their latest 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technorati.com/weblog/2005/08/34.html&quot;&gt;State of the
blogsphere&lt;/a&gt;. The number of blogs is doubling every 5 months currently, a
new blog is created almost every second. Even ignoring the spam blogs that
appear on blogspot and other services, this is a huge number of blogs. As
pointed out in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,12899,00.asp&quot;&gt;the
article&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://svana.org/sjh/diary/2005/08/27#2005-08-27_01&quot;&gt;I
linked to about cats&lt;/a&gt; the other day, most of the blogs out there are
rubbish, and far too many of them seem to contain endless photos of pet cats.

&lt;p&gt;

So if you write a bunch of stuff and do not use your existing reputation or
google juice to pump it into any sort of readership how does it get noticed? I
think the only way really is two fold a) have a lot of good content on it. and
b) use tagging services and other techniques so posts from it will start to
appear in the appropriate places when being searched for. It is fortunate that
good content matters more than almost anything else, otherwise spam blogs
would be far more successful than they are currently. Also a good anonymous
blog is obviously done for the art, for the sake of the blog, to improve ones
writing or thinking on some given subject, it has no bearing on any real world
social status or status of the author on the Internet, a form of art for the
sake of the art.</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>